Posts
293
Comments
27
Trackbacks
206
May 2005 Entries
The truth is hard
The new Writerbo. And this link from the comments is true for all writers, no matter the genre. The last item is particularly apt.
[Listening to: Slide - Dido - No Angel (UK Edition) [ECD] [UK]]
posted @ Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:00 AM | Feedback (-5)
Tools and Programmers
Chris is worried about programmers and tools. Are there still programmers? What's the difference between a programmer and a developer? It's a semantic thing; to me it doesn't matter what the term is, it's what and how you do your job. In my life I've seen plenty of people to whom their job was just that, a job. They came in at 9, did their allotted programming, and left at 5, I've never been able to understand that mentally, to switch off like that. When you're in the flow time is an illusion (lunchtime double so). Even on bad days you want to get beyond the problem. I've always believed I'm a hacker, in the old sense of the word; someone who wants to learn, wants to know how things work, will spent time pulling things apart just for curiosity. Do I still consider myself a developer? Hmm, tricky question since I spent most of my time writing. How we view the audience of books depends upon the book. Professional level books hit the developer/hacker type people; those who want to learn and want to push themselves. They are experienced (generally) programmers. The beginner level is always difficult because your audience is much broader, from students to retirees. Some have no programming experience whatsoever, some have a little but not in the discipline of the book. When writing you put yourself into their position; despite the fact that you as a writer aren't the target audience, you've been where they are, so you can see from their point of view. In the past the tools have been poor for beginners. Everything was way more complex than it needed to be, with far too much having to be done by the user. With the current crop of tools, with their promised "70% less code" we have another problem. It's now even easier to code, which means it's easy for newbies to code badly, relying upon the tool to make good what you do. The assumption being that if you can "drag and drop" then it must be OK. It's a fairly natural assuption to make for someone not familiar with the technology. My view is that this methodology of designing is great to get you going, so you can see results quickly; it's a confidence booster that you can at least achieve something. What we, in writing books for beginners that demonstrate this easy technique, have to do is ensure that the reader understands this is a beginning and that it's not necessarily the best way to achieve results. All of us in this field who write and teach have a duty to make sure that people understand this dilema; yes use the tool, o stuff quickly, but understand it's not a panacea.
[Listening to: Do Nothing - The Specials - Stereo-Typical (A's B's And Rarities) [UK]]
posted @ Tuesday, May 24, 2005 10:20 AM | Feedback (0)
The trials of company ownership
I, like many people, have a company, one I registered in Scotland when I used to live in Edinburgh. Since then the registered company address has bee a solicter up there, and for a modest fee they just forward all the post to me. Recently they decided that they weren't going to do that anymore unless you wanted their "full secretaial services" and a not so modest £750 per year, which is just way too much for a few stamps. So I dutifully filled in the official form to change the registered address, only to have it sent back to me as, for Scottish registered companies, you can't have a regitered address outside of Scotland. Really, really daft. I now have two options: 1. Shop around, with the inevitable delays and hone calls. 2.Register a new company in England, transfer the old one to the new one, wind down the old one and then change the name (assuming I want to keep it, which I do). Looks like I need to get on the phone then, as option 2 is way too complicated.
[Listening to: Exchange - Massive Attack - Mezzanine]
posted @ Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:46 PM | Feedback (0)
Microsoft mHome

On Saturday I headed down into the big smoke to visit the Microsoft mHome, which is a media enabled house in lovely quiet leafy street in West London. Essentially it's a demo house to show the possibilities of Meda Center and a variety of other cool features, such as the Mirror TV and the vibrating stone - a speaker that is fist size vibrating err, well stone, that you place on a solid surface and the vibrations turn that surface into a speaker. Surprisingly good, considering how snobiish I can be about hifi. I also like being able to write out the shopping list on a table (handwriting) and then copying and pasting this into a Tesco online search box, whereupon the writing was recognised and the items added to the list. Mind you going to Tesco is my weekly time out - if I used home shopping I'd never leave the house at all.

For me though the house didn't go nearly far enough, probably due to two reaons: the brief, being to show Microsoft technology and the home being an existing home without much in the way of interface to home automation, The house already has Linn Knekt multi-room audio controllers in many rooms, but this wasn't interfaced into. While the MCE features are great (and I really do love MCE), wouldn't it be cool if you could already utilise existing functionality - just select MCE as your music source from the Knekt system? The second area I though lacking was the multi-room support within MCE itself. Three of the rooms had separate MCE boxes, and while that gives great flexibility, the MCE boxes record TV locally. This means that if you record TV on one MCE box it's not automatically available for viewing on another. You can probably share these folders (I'm not sure about that) but it's an extra step that many users wouldn't want (or indeed be able) to do. The one step missing is extenders - I'm desperately waiting for these in the UK because it might mean I don't have to buy yet another machine for MCE (a quietone for underneath the TV). I could just shove some tuners in a PC and put that in the eisting cabinet, and then use an extender. For the multi-room house this is an attractive proposition, as it allows all recorded TV to be stored on the main MCE box, while extenders just make this available to the other rooms. Now the lack of hardware precludes this from being shown in the mHome, but there was an XBox sitting underneath the main TV and there is extender software for the XBox. This should have been enabled and placed in the 'teenager bedroom' (the natural home for an XBox in this scenario). The XBox 360 is of course going to have MCE features built-in (what these are is still under wraps and I only know what I've read on the Web) so once that's released one of these should be placed in the mHome.

The final let down really is due to the actual house and this was home automation. These are things that generally need to be built in as a house is constructed, as retro-fitting often incurs significant time and effort. We did see an HA add in for MCE that controlled a table lamp via X10, but it would have been far better to see the entire lighting system done this way. That wasn't possible in this house as the lights weren't automated (X10 sucks for main lights anyway, far better to use cbus or another alternative), but it was frustrating to have the potential and not see it realised. The add-in (the name of which I can't remember) also supported HVAC and alarm systems, both of which have exceedingly poor support in the UK. It can be done, but fully integrated systems are few and far between.

Overall a positive experience and I'm grateful for the chance I had to see it.

[Listening to: Bob Harris Friday - - ]
posted @ Monday, May 09, 2005 10:33 AM | Feedback (1)
Political Correctness Gone Too Far?
So, polling day in the UK and chatting to the nice ladies manning the village hall it turns out that the whole thing is rather stricter than I though. Part of the conversation went like this: Me: Still, it's a good excuse to sit and read Them: Only if it's not a political book Me: Really? What about the paper? Them: No, at least not in the open. Me: That's daft. Them: Yes. Even our clothes have to be non-political. No red, blue or green. Me: Right. because we're all simple minded, easily impressionable fools. Actually I made that last bit up, but it makes you wonder how the politicians think of us if they worry we can be that easily swayed. Personally I think that anyone who seeks power should be automatically disqualified. I want Stephen Fry to be the PM, 'cos I think he'd be great. And I want Kate Rusby to be Queen, but that's another story.
[Listening to: Another - Mandalay - Empathy [UK]]
posted @ Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:12 PM | Feedback (1)
Titter
This made me laugh.
[Listening to: Bob Harris Friday - - ]
posted @ Monday, May 02, 2005 10:58 AM | Feedback (2)