RE: Political Correctness Gone Too Far?

Just read Dave's musings on his polling-day experiences and discovery of the tight regulations surrounding the conduct of polling-station volunteers:

... it makes you wonder how the politicians think of us if they worry we can be that easily swayed.
[Via writerus drivelus]

This reminds me of the story of a guy who turned up at a polling station, very late, quite drunk, demanding to be allowed to vote for Mrs Thatcher. A kind police officer attending the polling station explained to the gentleman that he could certainly vote, if he calmed down. However, the man grew more irate when he discovered Mrs Thatcher wasn't on his ballot paper (not being in Finchley, where Maggie was the MP). The officer attempted to explain to him that he couldn't vote directly for Mrs Thatcher, but could show his support for her by voting for the local Conservative candidate.

Of course, the Labour party member attending the polling station, on hearing a uniformed police officer advising a member of the public inside the polling station to vote for a particular candidate immediately began to raise hell about breaches of the Representation of the People Act. Which all goes to show that while, for most of us, elections are just about expressing an opinion, for those directly involved, they are about winning and losing and the slightest breach of the rules could be the difference between one and the other.

So electoral regulations like this are not about protecting the weak-minded from subliminal propaganda; they are all about protecting the legitimate winner from accusations made by the loser(s) of benefitting from biases built in to the process.

It's been said that democracy isn't about showing support for the winner, but rather demonstrating to the loser that they don't have support, and therefore should shut up and let the government get on with it for a few years. Otherwise, such large groups of politically motivated people have, historically, had a tendency to raise armies and start civil wars.

Not entirely sure I agree, but it does put the whole process of putting a pencil cross in a box into a little perspective, I think...

Print | posted on Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:54 PM

Comments on this post

# re: RE: Political Correctness Gone Too Far?

Requesting Gravatar...
Actually the they said that it was the candidates who'd set the rules and I assumed it was for that very reason - so there could be no accusation of bias. Interestingly they have no control over the venue, so the table cloth was green and the chairs were red and blue.
Left by Dave on May 05, 2005 6:09 PM

# re: RE: Political Correctness Gone Too Far?

Requesting Gravatar...
I've found today that one of the more interesting side-effects of the election is the conversation topics at the office, and the reaction to the varying opinions. I walk in to the office, desperately grab a coffee and sit here with heavy eyelids, scouring the BBC site, looking up the exact results for a variety of constituencies and attempting some mental arithmetic. I mention the fact that I didn't get much sleep last night - the response varies between "why? Oh, the election, right - well, there's not much point staying up - you can find out what happened in the morning, and besides, we all knew who was going to win" to conversations along the lines of "how late were you up? what did you think of Jack Straw's result?". Having been out on a recent team outing at work, we all realised that our team of about 10 people have wide ranging beliefs on all manner of topics, and political leanings from the strongly left wing to the strongly right wing. We all still manage to get on, though, which is reassuring.
Left by Chris on May 06, 2005 3:57 PM

Your comment:

 (will show your gravatar)
 
Please add 5 and 4 and type the answer here: